Hotfix #37
Hotfix #37
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces an experimental Turbopack configuration in Next.js and updates dependency versions and development scripts. It restructures several app pages by commenting out deprecated components, streamlining layouts, and refining global styles. Additionally, multiple UI components have been updated—removing unused code, adjusting styling constants, and refreshing layouts and dimensions—to enhance maintainability and consistency throughout the application. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)Possibly related PRs
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
src/app/page.tsxOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 9.23.0 ESLint couldn't find an eslint.config.(js|mjs|cjs) file. From ESLint v9.0.0, the default configuration file is now eslint.config.js. https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/configure/migration-guide If you still have problems after following the migration guide, please stop by src/app/globals.cssOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 9.23.0 ESLint couldn't find an eslint.config.(js|mjs|cjs) file. From ESLint v9.0.0, the default configuration file is now eslint.config.js. https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/configure/migration-guide If you still have problems after following the migration guide, please stop by next.config.jsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 9.23.0 ESLint couldn't find an eslint.config.(js|mjs|cjs) file. From ESLint v9.0.0, the default configuration file is now eslint.config.js. https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/configure/migration-guide If you still have problems after following the migration guide, please stop by
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/app/gallery/page.tsx (1)
4-4: Document the reason for disabling upload functionality.Commenting out code rather than removing it suggests this is a temporary change. Add a comment explaining why the ImageUploadButton is being disabled to provide context for future developers.
-// import ImageUploadButton from "~/components/ui/gallery/default-upload-button"; +// import ImageUploadButton from "~/components/ui/gallery/default-upload-button"; +// TODO: Upload functionality temporarily disabled as part of the security hotfix (PR #37)src/components/ui/main-title.tsx (1)
16-24: Improved layout structure with responsive designThe component structure effectively uses the styling constants to create a visually centered and responsive layout. The NextLogo wrapper with responsive width control (w-40 md:w-60) ensures it scales appropriately on different devices.
One minor accessibility consideration: nesting an interactive element (NextLogo contains a link) inside an h1 heading might not follow strict accessibility guidelines, but it appears to be a stylistic choice for this component.
src/components/ui/top-bar.tsx (1)
28-33: Consider reviewing sizing consistencyWhile the layout structure is improved, there are a few considerations:
- The
size-9class sets both width and height to 9 units, but is combined with different flex behaviors (flex-growvsflex-none), which might create inconsistent layouts- The div containing the UserButton has a large padding (p-12) which might push it out of alignment with other elements
- Consider adding responsive classes to ensure the layout works well on different screen sizes
- <div className="flex size-9 flex-none p-1"> + <div className="flex h-9 w-auto flex-none p-1"> <UploadButton></UploadButton> </div> - <div className="flex size-9 flex-none p-12"> + <div className="flex h-9 w-auto flex-none p-4"> <UserButton></UserButton> </div>next.config.js (1)
55-61: Consider implementing conditional TypeScript/ESLint checksThese commented blocks show a good practice of only enforcing strict checks in production. Consider uncommenting and implementing this approach to speed up development while maintaining quality in production.
-// Only disable for development to speed up iteration -// typescript: { -// ignoreBuildErrors: process.env.NODE_ENV !== "production", -// }, -// eslint: { -// ignoreDuringBuilds: process.env.NODE_ENV !== "production", -// }, +// Only disable for development to speed up iteration +typescript: { + ignoreBuildErrors: process.env.NODE_ENV !== "production", +}, +eslint: { + ignoreDuringBuilds: process.env.NODE_ENV !== "production", +},
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yamlpublic/favicon.icois excluded by!**/*.icopublic/icon.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgsrc/app/favicon.icois excluded by!**/*.ico
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
next.config.js(3 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)src/app/gallery/page.tsx(2 hunks)src/app/globals.css(2 hunks)src/app/layout.tsx(3 hunks)src/app/page.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/clerk-sign-in.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/ui/footer.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/main-title.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/next-logo.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/starboy-logo.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/ui/top-bar.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (3)
src/components/ui/top-bar.tsx (1)
src/components/ui/upload-button.tsx (1)
UploadButton(41-88)
src/components/ui/footer.tsx (1)
src/components/ui/next-logo.tsx (1)
NextLogo(6-21)
src/components/ui/main-title.tsx (1)
src/components/ui/next-logo.tsx (1)
NextLogo(6-21)
🔇 Additional comments (26)
src/components/ui/starboy-logo.tsx (2)
8-8: Improved styling approach with direct utility classes.The transition from using a constant variable to directly applying utility classes in the JSX improves readability at the component level.
17-18:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify logo sizing impact on responsive layouts.
Increasing the logo dimensions from 210 to 300 makes it significantly larger, which could impact the layout on smaller screens.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the larger logo size is referenced in any responsive styling rules # Search for any responsive styles specifically targeting this logo rg "starboy-logo" --type css rg "StarboyLogo" -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 2337
Action Required: Verify Responsive Layout Impact of Increased Logo Size
The update sets the logo dimensions to 300×300, but in
src/app/layout.tsxthe logo is wrapped in a container with fixed sizing (w-48 md:w-60). This discrepancy could lead to overflow or layout issues on smaller screens. Please:
- Review the container sizing: Check if the fixed width in
src/app/layout.tsxis intentionally set and can accommodate a 300×300 image.- Examine CSS rules: Look into
src/styles/starboy-logo.cssfor any responsive adjustments that might need updating.- Test across devices: Verify the logo's appearance on various breakpoints to ensure it scales appropriately.
src/app/globals.css (2)
10-10: Good documentation improvement.Adding this comment helps clarify the purpose of the CSS variables section that follows.
39-39: Improved dark mode background contrast.Changing the dark mode background from 0% to 3.9% lightness creates a slightly lighter dark background, which should improve content readability and reduce eye strain.
src/components/ui/clerk-sign-in.tsx (4)
6-6: Enhanced button sizing and typography.Increasing padding and adjusting font size for medium screens improves the visual hierarchy and touch target size.
8-8: Improved interactive state styling.The hover color change to blue provides better visual feedback, and the padding creates a more balanced appearance when the button is interacted with.
15-25:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify text styling doesn't affect button accessibility.
The added div wrapping the SignInButton with gradient styling could potentially affect screen reader interpretation of the button.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any accessibility tests for buttons fd -t f -e tsx -e ts "test|spec" | xargs grep -l "accessibility\|a11y\|aria"Length of output: 78
Action: Manually Verify Accessibility Impact of Gradient Styling
Based on our review, there are no automated accessibility tests in the repository that confirm the gradient styling (applied via the wrapping div with the
textStyleclass) does not interfere with the button’s accessibility. Please ensure:
- The ARIA label on the
<button>("Sign in to your account") is correctly exposed to screen readers.- The visual gradient styling does not affect text contrast or focus indicators that might confuse users relying on assistive technology.
- Consider adding dedicated accessibility tests if none exist, to automatically verify that similar styling updates won’t degrade user experience in future revisions.
9-10:❓ Verification inconclusive
Ensure gradient text has sufficient contrast.
While the gradient text styling adds visual appeal, ensure it has sufficient contrast with its background for accessibility.
🌐 Web query:
What are the WCAG contrast requirements for text with gradient backgrounds?💡 Result:
To meet WCAG contrast requirements for text on gradient backgrounds, the key is ensuring sufficient contrast ratios across all gradient segments. Here’s a structured summary of the guidelines and solutions:
Core Requirements
- Normal text requires a minimum contrast ratio of 4.5:1 against the background[2][4][6][11].
- Large text (≥18pt or ≥14pt bold) must have a ratio of 3:1[2][7][12].
- Non-text elements (e.g., icons, UI components) need a 3:1 ratio[4][15].
Gradient-Specific Strategies
Color-Stop Evaluation
Test the text color against all gradient color-stop points. Each segment must meet the minimum ratio[3][9]. For example:
- A gradient from white to pink requires checking text contrast against both white and pink[1][3].
- Use tools like WebAIM Contrast Checker or Accessible Web to verify ratios[5][13].
Average Gradient Color
Calculate the average color of the gradient (e.g., using libraries liketinycolor2) and ensure text meets the required ratio against this average[1][8].Dynamic Contrast Adjustments
Programmatically adjust text color using CSS or JavaScript to generate a contrasting gradient. For example:.contrast-text { background: linear-gradient(contrasting-colors); background-clip: text; color: transparent; }This layers a contrasting gradient over the original, ensuring legibility at all points[1][3].
Overlay or Background Block
Place text on a solid-color block or semi-transparent overlay to simplify contrast checks. This strategy is effective for complex gradients[3][7].Common Pitfalls & Fixes
- Failing gradients: If parts of the gradient fail contrast checks, darken/lighten the text or modify the gradient[1][6].
- Hover/focus states: Test contrast ratios for all interactive states (hover, focus, etc.)[9][13].
- Decorative text: Text purely for decoration is exempt but must not convey essential information[11][15].
Tools for Compliance
- Automated checkers: ACHECKS, Accessible Web Helper[3][13].
- Libraries: Use
tinycolor2to programmatically adjust colors[1][6].By applying these methods, designers can ensure text remains accessible on gradient backgrounds while adhering to WCAG standards.
Citations:
- 1: https://www.propelauth.com/post/contrasting-text-gradient-background
- 2: https://accessiblyapp.com/web-accessibility/color-contrast/
- 3: https://www.achecks.org/gradients-accessible-colour-contrasts-with-gradient-backgrounds/
- 4: https://webaim.org/articles/contrast/
- 5: https://adasitecompliance.com/ada-color-contrast-checker/
- 6: https://blog.equally.ai/developer-guide/contrast-minimum/
- 7: https://www.accessibility-developer-guide.com/knowledge/colours-and-contrast/text/
- 8: https://www.boia.org/blog/designing-for-color-contrast-guidelines-for-accessibility
- 9: https://guides.18f.gov/accessibility/color/
- 10: https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/
- 11: https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/contrast-minimum.html
- 12: https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.9/color-contrast
- 13: https://accessibleweb.com/color-contrast-checker/
- 14: https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/html/4.4/color-contrast
- 15: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
- 16: https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/act/rules/09o5cg/
- 17: https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/non-text-contrast.html
- 18: https://my.willamette.edu/site/digital-accessibility/guidelines/color-contrast
Gradient Text Contrast Verification – Please Review WCAG Compliance
It appears the current gradient styling:
const textStyle = "mb-8 bg-gradient-to-r from-blue-400 via-purple-500 to-cyan-400 bg-clip-text font-semibold text-transparent";relies on a gradient that transitions through blue, purple, and cyan. To ensure accessibility, please verify that each gradient color-stop meets the WCAG requirements:
- Normal Text: A minimum contrast ratio of 4.5:1.
- Large/Bold Text: A minimum contrast ratio of 3:1.
Action Items:
- Evaluate the text contrast at each gradient color-stop (blue-400, purple-500, cyan-400) using tools like the WebAIM Contrast Checker.
- Consider adjustments (e.g., modifying gradient colors, using an overlay, or adjusting text styling) if any segment fails to meet the required ratios.
Please confirm these checks to ensure the gradient text remains accessible.
src/app/gallery/page.tsx (1)
39-39:✅ Verification successful
Consider removing unused code if it's part of the security fix.
If disabling the upload functionality is related to the security vulnerability mentioned in the PR objectives, consider removing the code entirely rather than commenting it out.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the default-upload-button component has any security issues rg -A 5 -B 5 "vulnerability\|security\|csrf\|xss" src/components/ui/gallery/default-upload-button.tsx 2>/dev/null || echo "File not found or no security-related comments in the file"Length of output: 230
Action Required: Remove the commented-out upload code if it’s intentionally disabled for security reasons.
After checking the associated upload component, no security-related keywords (vulnerability, CSRF, XSS, etc.) were found. If disabling the upload functionality is part of a security fix, please remove the code entirely instead of leaving it commented out. However, if you intend to re-enable this functionality later, consider adding a clear TODO or documentation note explaining the rationale.
- File:
src/app/gallery/page.tsx(Line 39)src/components/ui/next-logo.tsx (1)
1-22: Clean code implementation with good accessibility practices!The NextLogo component is well-structured with proper accessibility attributes for the link (target="_blank" and rel="noopener noreferrer"). The image has appropriate alt text, dimensions, and priority loading. The removal of commented-out code and unused style constants has improved code readability.
src/components/ui/footer.tsx (3)
8-8: Good use of utility classes for styling!The shift from imported CSS modules to utility classes (Tailwind CSS) makes the styling more maintainable and easier to understand directly in the component.
14-17: Effective container sizing for NextLogoAdding a wrapper div with a specific width class (w-36) for the NextLogo component helps control its size within the footer layout, ensuring proper visual balance.
19-19: Verify the copyright yearThe copyright year "12025" seems unusual. Is this intentional (futuristic) or a typo?
src/components/ui/main-title.tsx (1)
5-11: Excellent visual styling with gradient text effect!The styling constants are well-defined and create a visually appealing presentation:
- The gradient text effect using background-clip-text creates a modern look
- Responsive classes (md: prefixes) ensure the component looks good on different screen sizes
- Consistent spacing and layout control enhance the visual hierarchy
src/components/ui/top-bar.tsx (1)
12-27: Improved layout structure with flexboxThe restructured layout uses flexbox effectively to organize the logo section with flexible growth (
flex-grow). The logo image dimensions and priority loading are well-configured.src/app/page.tsx (3)
13-14: Flexible layout implementation looks goodThe new
centeredDivstyle uses flexbox with wrapping enabled, which provides better responsiveness than the previous implementation.
16-18: Nice typography enhancementsThe updated styles improve visual appeal with:
- Proper padding and responsive text sizing in
visitImageGalleryStyle- Gradient text effect in
textStylewith appropriate tracking and font weightThese changes align with modern UI design principles while maintaining accessibility.
22-35: Simplified component structureThe flatter component hierarchy with proper semantic elements improves both the code readability and the DOM structure. The aria attributes are correctly maintained for accessibility.
next.config.js (2)
10-34:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify Turbopack compatibility with your project
The experimental Turbopack configuration looks well-structured, but as an experimental feature, it might introduce instability.
🌐 Web query:
Are there any known issues with Next.js 15.2.3 Turbopack experimental mode?💡 Result:
Next.js 15.2.3's Turbopack experimental mode has several reported compatibility issues and limitations based on recent community reports and documentation:
Builder.io Integration Issues
Users encounter initialization errors when using Turbopack with Builder.io's devtools CLI:
- "Turbopack does not support the Builder.io devtools cli" error during setup [1]
- Requires manual integration with Next.js projects instead of CLI automation[1]
Monorepo Configuration Challenges
Multiple reports indicate problems in monorepo environments:
- Dependency resolution failures in Turborepo setups[7][13]
- Issues with npm/pnpm/Yarn Berry workspaces requiring workarounds[7]
- Common error: "Next.js package not found"[7][13]
# Common failure pattern Error [TurbopackInternalError]: Next.js package not found FATAL: Unexpected Turbopack error [13]Production Build Limitations
Key restrictions remain despite Turbopack's experimental status:
- No production build support (
next buildstill uses webpack)[4][6]- Missing support for AMP and legacy CSS Module features[4]
- Partial webpack loader API implementation[3]
Configuration Quirks
Developers report unexpected behavior with:
- Turbopack-specific config requiring experimental wrapper[9]
- Incompatibility with older
webpack()configurations[4]- Issues resolving aliases and custom extensions[3]
Performance and Memory Issues
Some users experience:
- Slow dev server compilation times[5]
- Memory leaks requiring custom limits (
memoryLimitoption)[4]- Intermittent crashes requiring trace files for debugging[4]
For troubleshooting, the Next.js team recommends using tracing for performance analysis:
NEXT_TURBOPACK_TRACING=1 next dev --turbopackWhile Turbopack shows improved dev server speeds in many cases, these unresolved issues suggest careful evaluation for production-critical projects. The Vercel team continues to address these in recent canary releases like 15.2.0-canary.27[7][11].
Citations:
- 1: https://forum.builder.io/t/turbopack-incompatibility-with-builder-ios-devtools-cli/7655
- 2: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/experimental-app-dir-config
- 3: https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/config/next-config-js/turbo
- 4: https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/turbopack
- 5: [NEXT-1143] Dev mode slow compilation vercel/next.js#48748
- 6: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next.js
- 7: [Turbopack] Error: Next.js package not found vercel/next.js#55987
- 8: Playwright tests with the
nextfixture always fail (using experimental testProxy) vercel/next.js#77449- 9: Turbo config only accepted in experimental [Next.js 15] vercel/next.js#71750
- 10: https://nextjs.org/blog/next-15
- 11: https://nextjs.org/blog/next-15-2
- 12: https://nextjs.org/blog
- 13: [Error [TurbopackInternalError]: Next.js package not found vercel/next.js#76028
Turbopack Experimental Mode: Verify Compatibility Thoroughly
The experimental Turbopack configuration is structured correctly, but recent community reports highlight several known issues with Next.js 15.2.3’s Turbopack experimental mode. Before proceeding, please verify that your project can tolerate these limitations, especially under production-like scenarios. Key concerns include:
- Integration Issues: Potential errors with Builder.io’s devtools CLI.
- Monorepo Challenges: Reported dependency resolution problems in multirepo or workspace setups.
- Production Limitations: Note that
next buildstill defaults to webpack, and certain features like AMP or legacy CSS modules aren’t supported.- Configuration & Performance Quirks: Issues with alias resolution, custom extensions, slow compilations, and possible memory leaks.
Please ensure these points align with your project’s requirements and test accordingly.
18-23:❓ Verification inconclusive
Consider updating SVG loader configuration
The current SVG loading configuration uses
@svgr/webpackand treats SVGs as JS files. While this works with Turbopack, you might want to verify if this is the recommended approach for your specific SVG usage patterns.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any SVG imports in the codebase and how they're used echo "Checking SVG usage patterns in the codebase..." rg -l '\.svg' --glob '*.{tsx,jsx,ts,js}'Length of output: 337
SVG Loader Configuration: Confirm Alignment with Best Practices
I verified that SVGs are imported across multiple parts of the codebase (e.g. in
src/components/ui/next-logo.tsx,src/components/ui/top-bar.tsx, and others), and the current configuration using@svgr/webpack(treating SVGs as JS files) appears functional with Turbopack. However, please review the latest guidelines and confirm that this approach remains the most appropriate for your specific SVG usage patterns.
- The configuration in
next.config.js(lines 18–23) remains unchanged.- Multiple files confirm active SVG imports, suggesting the current loader setup works.
- Recommend double-checking Turbopack/Next.js documentation to ensure this is still best practice.
package.json (2)
12-12: Turbo mode enabled for developmentThe
--turboflag enables Turbopack, which aligns with the experimental configuration in next.config.js. This should improve development speed.
33-33:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify compatibility with major version changes
You've updated ESLint from v8 to v9, which is a major version change that could introduce breaking changes. The Next.js update is minor (15.1.7 to 15.2.3).
Also applies to: 56-57
🌐 Web query:
What are the breaking changes in ESLint 9 compared to ESLint 8?💡 Result:
ESLint v9 introduced several significant breaking changes compared to v8, primarily focused on modernizing configurations, dropping legacy features, and improving consistency. Here are the key updates:
Configuration and Environment Changes
- New flat config format: Replaced
.eslintrcwitheslint.config.jsfor clearer, array-based configurations. This offers better performance and project-level customization[1][3][7].- Node.js requirement: Dropped support for Node.js versions below v18.18[1][7].
- Removed formatters: Core formatters like
codeframeandtablewere removed[7].Rule and CLI Behavior
- Deprecated rules:
require-jsdocandvalid-jsdocwere removed from core[7].- Stricter rule schemas: Rules like
comma-dangleandno-sequencesnow enforce stricter option validation[2][7].--quietflag behavior: Now excludes rules set to"warn"severity[7][3].--output-file: Writes files even when linting produces no output, affecting CI/CD workflows[5][7].Configuration Comments
- Severity-only comments (e.g.,
/* eslint semi: "warn" */) now merge with config file options instead of overriding them[7].- Multiple comments for the same rule in a file now trigger errors[7].
Plugin and Integration Updates
- Scope analysis fixes: Adjusted class
extendsclause scope handling and strict mode directive validation[5][7].- Performance changes: While intended to match v8 speeds, some users report inconsistent performance in specific scenarios[6].
Stricter
no-unused-varsBehavior
- New
caughtErrors: "all"default flags unused error variables incatchblocks[5][7].varsIgnorePatternno longer applies to caught errors[5][7].These changes align ESLint with modern JavaScript practices but require careful migration planning—particularly for Vue.js projects using the new flat config format[3]. Developers should audit existing configurations and update dependencies like
typescript-eslintto v8+ for compatibility[4].Citations:
- 1: https://www.dhiwise.com/blog/design-converter/migration-to-eslint-v9-a-quick-and-simple-guide
- 2: https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/migrate-to-8.0.0
- 3: https://vueschool.io/articles/vuejs-tutorials/upgrading-eslint-from-v8-to-v9-in-vue-js/
- 4: https://typescript-eslint.io/blog/announcing-typescript-eslint-v8/
- 5: https://eslint.org/blog/2024/04/eslint-v9.0.0-released/
- 6: Performance differences between ESlint v8 and v9 eslint/eslint#19528
- 7: https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/migrate-to-9.0.0
- 8: ESLint v9 contains breaking API changes jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#3699
Action Required: Confirm ESLint Configuration Compatibility
You've upgraded ESLint from v8 to v9—a major update that introduces several breaking changes. As detailed in the verification:
- Configuration Modernization: ESLint v9 now supports a new flat config format (using
eslint.config.js) and may require adjustments if you’re still using legacy.eslintrcfiles.- Node.js Requirements: Support for Node.js versions below v18.18 has been dropped; ensure your environment meets this requirement.
- Removed Features and Stricter Validations: Core formatters (like
codeframeandtable) and deprecated rules such asrequire-jsdochave been removed. Several rules now enforce stricter option validation, which might affect your custom rules.In contrast, the Next.js update from 15.1.7 to 15.2.3 is minor and should not introduce major compatibility issues.
Action Items:
- Audit your ESLint configuration: Verify that your configuration (and any referenced custom rules) complies with the ESLint v9 requirements.
- Confirm Environment Compatibility: Ensure the project’s Node.js version meets the new minimum supported version.
- Revisit Related Changes: This verification also applies to lines 56-57—please check those changes for consistency.
src/app/layout.tsx (4)
1-1: Cleaner import statementGood job cleaning up the import statement to only include what's necessary.
32-36: Style constants improve maintainabilityDefining style constants directly in the file is a good approach for components with unique styling needs. The constants are descriptive and follow a consistent naming pattern.
60-63: Responsive logo sizing implementedAdding width constraints with responsive breakpoints for the logo enhances the layout across different screen sizes.
70-70: More descriptive commentThe updated comment better describes the purpose of this section.
Summary by CodeRabbit